Source Link: http://blog.redefininggod.com/2014/03/04/how-and-why-the-globalistsimf-took-down-ukraine-by-the-numbers.aspx
How and Why the Globalists/IMF took down Ukraine, by the numbers
For the second installment in this series of articles, I was planning on writing about the globalist/IMF takedown of the Arab Spring countries. Before I go there, though, I thought it might be useful to show how they took down the Ukraine step-by-step. Once you see how they pulled it off, you'll more easily see the parallels to what happened in countries like Libya and Egypt.Before we start, I remind you of the template the globalists use for dealing with countries that are resistant to assimilation by their New World Order system...
1) Stir up a color revolution to pressure a resistant nation's government to implement globalist structural changes.
2) If the existing government can't be pressured into making the changes, overturn it and install a client regime.
3) Have the client regime invite in the IMF to solve the economic crisis created by the "peoples revolution."
4) Float the nation's currency on the (heavily manipulated) "free" market, cut social services and subsidies to the bone, and make changes to the nation's constitution and laws so it's NWO-compliant.
So let's begin with...
STEP ONE: Stir up a color revolution to pressure a resistant nation's government to implement globalist structural changes.
To illustrate how this step unfolded in Ukraine, there is no better example than this New York Times propaganda piece. Here is its header picture and first three paragraphs...
"Yuri V. Lutsenko, a onetime field commander of Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution, looked out across the tens of thousands of people who gathered on Sunday to protest the government’s decision to back away from a far-reaching political and trade deal with the European Union. Standing onstage under an ash-streaked sky, Mr. Lutsenko felt a powerful sense of déjà vu — and a deep need to apologize.
'I am sure that every person who stood at the glorious Orange Square nine years ago has to do the same,' he told the crowd. 'I would like you to accept my personal apologies for what was not finished.'
For the second time in a decade, Ukraine is in turmoil, with tens of thousands of protesters in recent days loudly demanding that the country shake off its post-Soviet identity and move once and for all into the orbit of a more prosperous Europe."
In this passage, the former Orange Revolution "field commander" bemoans the Ukrainian government's rejection of the EU deal and apologizes for the Revolution's true objectives being "not finished." This clearly demonstrates the actual intent behind the first round of the Orange revolution: to pressure the Ukrainian government into what the picture caption calls "a deal that would have advanced the country's integration with the European Union." The article then goes on to blame Russia for the rejection instead of stating the real reason, which was this:
The
"far-reaching political and trade deal with the European Union" would
have required the same "structural changes" that the IMF is now
demanding, and those changes are not good for the Ukrainian people.
As for the article's suggestion that the deal would have let the Ukraine "move once and for all into the orbit of a more prosperous Europe," are you kidding me?!? Go to Greece, Italy, Spain, or any number of the other nations that have been hoodwinked into surrendering their sovereignty to the globalists in Brussels and ask the people about "a more prosperous Europe." They will laugh in your face.
To their credit, the less-controlled policy makers within the Ukrainian government managed to finally block the EU deal, which led to the next step...
STEP TWO: If the existing government can't be pressured into making the changes, overturn it and install a client regime.
Observe the Ukrainian Four-Eyed Weasel in its native habitat, the House of Parliament...
We saw Step 2 unfold with the resumption of the color revolution and with Yanukovych's sudden, inexplicable abandonment of his presidency. If the Russians were truly behind Ukraine's rejection of the EU deal, why didn't they backstop Yanukovych and why are they now pressuring Ukraine into an IMF deal? The answer is simple: Russia is run by globalists too (as is China and the rest of the BRICS). The whole West versus East "conflict" is just another application of controlled opposing forces to achieve globalist ends.
So with the Ukraine's resistant government in disarray, the globalists moved immediately to install a client regime, and they wasted no time in seizing the most crucial post. On the 24th, just two days after Yanukovych took a dive, a globalist puppet was installed as the head of the Ukrainian Central Bank. According to this Bloomberg article...
"Lawmakers appointed Stepan Kubiv, the ex-chairman of Lviv-based VAT Kredobank, to head the central bank after voting out Ihor Sorkin. The monetary authority this month introduced capital controls to halt the hryvnia’s slide after the currency fell to a five-year low against the dollar. Kubiv plans to invite an International Monetary Fund mission, the Unian news service reported, without giving details."
Why do I say he's a globalist puppet, you ask? He was one of the "commandants" of the Euromaidan Demonstrations (so he was an organizing participant in the color revolution). He was also the former head of bankster-controlled Kredobank. And according to this article at Zerohedge...
"Who is Kredobank? As it turns out, it is the bank with the largest Polish investment in banking institution in Ukraine. Kredobank national network contains central branch and 130 outlets throughout Ukraine. Today, European investment is 99.6% in the share capital of Kredobank, Ukrainian capital is 0.4%."
And what did Kubiv do upon taking the reins of the Ukrainian Central Bank? Not only did he invite in the IMF, but he also moved to consolidate central control over all Ukrainian banks. According to the same Zerohedge article...
>>>While the "developed" world scrambles to find a way to provide Ukraine with a bailout in such a way that Russia doesn't turn off the gas, Ukraine is doing some scrambling of its own to assure the local banks, which have been plagued by both bank runs and a collapse in the currency to record lows over the past few days, that it will be there to provide funding on a business as usual basis. Itar-Tass reports that "Ukrainian banks will be provided with necessary liquid assets, including cash." But there is a condition: the funding will only come "if they will remain under open control of the National Bank of Ukraine, the newly-appointed NBU Chairman Stepan Kubiv is quoted as saying on the bank’s official website."<<<
So just 48 hours or so after Yanukovych runs off to Russia, the globalists install one of the conspirators of the color revolution as the head of the central bank and he immediately moves to control all Ukrainian banks and bring in the IMF.
Then, on the 27th, they had another puppet installed as Prime Minister. According to this Fox News article...
"Ukraine's parliament has approved Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the country's new prime minister...
Yatsenyuk will face the hugely complicated task of restoring stability in a country that is not only deeply divided politically, but on the verge of financial collapse. He is widely viewed as a technocratic reformer who enjoys the support of the U.S."
The "technocratic reformer" part really made me laugh. Have you folks in Europe heard the word "technocrat" before?
If not, ask the Italians [I corrected a few typos in the excerpt]..."The Monti cabinet was the sixty-first cabinet of the government of Italy and was announced on 16 November 2011. The cabinet was composed of independents, three of whom were women and was formed as an interim government. The government ran the country for eighteen months until after the elections in the Spring of 2013 and then was replaced by the Letta Cabinet that was formed by Enrico Letta on 28 April...
On 9 November 2011, Monti was appointed a Lifetime Senator by Italian President Giorgio Napolitano. He was seen as a favourite to replace Silvio Berlusconi to lead a new unity government in Italy in order to implement reforms and austerity measures...
On 16 November 2011, Monti was sworn in as Prime Minister of Italy, after unveiling a technocratic cabinet composed entirely of unelected professionals."
Even
within the EU, national governments are not safe from being overturned
if they find themselves unable to implement the required NWO structural
changes.
So with a puppet government promptly emplaced in the Ukraine, the globalists have progressed to steps 3 and 4...
STEPS THREE AND FOUR: 3) Have the client regime invite in the IMF
to solve the economic crisis created by the "peoples revolution." -and -
4) Float the nation's currency on the (heavily manipulated) "free"
market, cut social services and subsidies to the bone, and make changes
to the nation's constitution and laws so it's NWO-compliant.
Will the IMF also demand their logo be added to the Ukrainian flag?...
As I showed in the first article and in earlier parts of this article, the IMF has already been invited in by the new head of the central bank, and the new "technocrat" Prime Minister has vowed "collaboration with the International Monetary Fund" and that Ukraine "will fulfill all the conditions, I repeat, all the conditions, that are necessary for this loan." Spoken like a true slave, Yats.
Of course, the banking system takeover is just the tip of the iceberg of the "structural changes" the globalists will attempt to force upon Ukraine. The people there can also look forward to the fracking of their land, Monsanto and its GMO crops, substantially diminished social services and subsidies, and a variety of other nasty developments. If they don't stop the new government that is inviting all this evil upon them, they will taste the full horror of what the Times calls a "once and for all" move "into the orbit of a more 'prosperous' Europe."
On a final note, I'd like to point out the different levels of awareness from which people are observing the Ukrainian situation:
1) On the most naive level are the sheeple and those among the awakened community who have been hypnotized by faux-truthers and false-light propaganda to see Ukraine as the triumph of "people power." They are being fed headlines like...
"The people are rising up around the world and demanding change!"
...and they are seeing Ukraine (and the Arab Spring) as evidence that humanity is moving to defeat the Establishment. When I encounter such people, I want to (lovingly) slap the sh*t from betwixt their ears.
In many cases, especially those in NWO-resistant nations, people are taking to the streets because they are having their grievances manipulated by sophisticated propaganda techniques and social media campaigns. Once the agency instigators convince them to get out and march, globalist thugs are inserted amongst them to kill them (and create the impression that it's the resistant government that's doing it) and to terrorize resistant government officials into acquiescing or resigning.
When they sufficiently bend or break the government with their mercenary agents, the globalists install their "technocrats" and structural changes. So while the people are taking to the streets for what they think are good reasons, they are only providing cover for the globalists to turn their nations upside down. This is not a time in history when one should willingly be part of a herd.
2) On a more informed level of awareness are those who see the Ukrainian situation as being a play-out of geopolitical forces pitting nation against nation, alliance against alliance, and economic interest against economic interest. On one level of looking at the world, this is true, but it is not the ultimate driving force behind what is happening.
Consider World War 2 in Europe. The great majority of people -- even those within the government and military establishments -- saw it as a real conflict between the "Allies" and "Axis," and to a degree, it was. But who was financing the Allied war effort? Who was financing the Axis war effort? And to whom were both the victors and the vanquished indebted when it was all over?
Asking yourself these questions, you start to expand your awareness to the truth of the matter: people of higher awareness (the Central Banksters and the Occulted Powers they work for) pitted people of lower awareness against each other and got them to fight. This got rid of "excess population," put the combatants deeper into "debt" to the banksters, and broke down existing economic and political structures so the Occulted Powers could remake them in the form they wanted. This was the true driving force behind the war, not the silly and insignificant disputes between the nations involved.
With all this in mind, look at the current conflict in Ukraine. Is it really about Russian gas, NATO expansion, the encirclement of Russia, or any of the other surface issues? No, it's about driving Ukraine into the NWO fold via the IMF. After all, once enough nations have fallen, the Russians and their BRICS allies will take the reins of the IMF, so the Russians will ultimately lose no influence in Ukraine. This "reset" in IMF leadership has already been telegraphed to the public.
3) At the necessary level of awareness of the Ukraine situation are those who see chaos being created so a New Order can rise like a phoenix from the ashes...
Looking at the Ukraine drama from this perspective, one can see the captivating circus of military confrontation in the Crimea as a distraction from the relatively boring (but profoundly impactful) implementation of the economic and social "reforms" the globalists are pushing. And if you want more proof of distraction, consider the known disinformation providers who are over-hyping the Crimean military situation with maximum fear language. It is as if they are screaming "Look at this! Look at this!" (and don't pay attention to the dull matters of state).
The military confrontation is more than just a mere distraction, though, since it can be leveraged to create the narrative for bringing down the old financial system when the time is right. Have a look at this Straits Times article titled Ukraine crisis: Russia warns of dropping US dollar as reserve currency if US imposes sanctions...
"MOSCOW (REUTERS) – A Kremlin aide was quoted on Tuesday as saying that if the United States were to impose sanctions on Russia over Ukraine, Moscow might be forced to drop the dollar as a reserve currency and refuse to pay off any loans to US banks.
Mr Sergei Glazyev, who is often used by the authorities to stake out a hardline stance but does not make policy, was cited by RIA news agency as saying Moscow could recommend that all holders of US treasuries sell them if Washington freezes the US accounts of Russian businesses and individuals."
The Crimean situation is a pot the globalists will keep boiling until it's time to turn up the heat and let it boil over into a further crisis. In much the same way, they are keeping the Syrian crisis boiling so they can stir up a new Middle East crisis whenever they need one. If and when the boil-overs occur, don't get carried away by fear. It's just a smokescreen to obscure the takedown of the old financial system.
In the next entry in this series, I'll show how this step-by-step globalist/IMF/NWO assimilation process was paralleled in Libya, Egypt, and other (Operation) Arab Spring countries. If you find this entry informative but have not read the first one, I recommend you have a look at it: The Globalist Agenda in Ukraine: color revolution begets cash crunch begets IMF control (and Russia is helping)
I send you my love....
http://blog.redefininggod.com/2014/03/04/how-and-why-the-globalistsimf-took-down-ukraine-by-the-numbers.aspx
