~ascensionwithearth.com
********************************************************************
,+based+on+an+engraving+by+William+Sharpe,+based+on+a+painting+by+George+Romney,+1792..jpg)
The Purpose of The Union of The States
-What
Are We The United States For?
Parisse Deza
We now stand in an unparalleled, all-American storm of contention,
a creative chaos comparable to the setting of the early American Revolution. Exactly
the same kinds of actions and reactions are present today, but on a much, much
larger scale. A process has been catalyzed, but to what end? Let’s turn away
from the commotion of external events and enter the quiet center of our situation.
Let’s revisit the ideas held in mind at our beginnings so we can reestablish
our direction and fulfill our destiny.
How We Began It
We live in a union of sovereign nation-states, born when thirteen
new colonies gathered to create a sanctuary of freedom, based on respect for
divinely bestowed free will, not to be tampered with nor infringed on, safe
from the oppression of tyranny, where the people could be happy and thrive. A
sanctuary of freedom. A happy people. This is what they wanted.
Why don’t we have this yet and what would make it possible? A
few historical and philosophical essentials will clarify and, by the power of our
willingness, facilitate the delivery of our destiny which has been on hold for
a very long time. America had been stuck in the birth canal.
The first thing to do is to define who and what we are
talking about.
The original name of this gathering of colonies, as per the
Declaration of Independence, is: “the States of America”. The word “united”
appears on the document before the name in lower case letters as an adjective,
and is not part of the proper name: “the united States of America”. The
colonies saw themselves, correctly, as individual, sovereign states of being comprised of sovereign individuals.
Those thirteen were separate nation-states, a term still used to mean country, that joined together for mutual benefit as a confederation. Now, we have fifty
individual, sovereign countries which
are still banded together in a confederation. So, the united States are not actually
a country. This is the basis of an understanding of sovereignty: each of us
natives was born an American
state-national (the correct legal term) in the nation-state of our birth.
If you were born in Connecticut, that is the nation of your birth. It is like
being part of a tribe, say, the Sioux Nation. The reason for this clarification
is simple: in order to have our free will respected we must remember that we, the people, are in charge as sovereign
individuals over sovereign states over a sovereign confederacy, not a government-as-a-country over states,
over the people, as we have now. What we have now is an upside-down pyramid.
This confederation chose to use a Republic form of
government, not a democracy. One of our biggest misconceptions is that we
insist on believing we have a democracy. Somehow, that word has become a
synonym for equality and an enlightened, free state. The founders did not want
a democracy. As Judge Anna von Reitz succinctly expressed:
“Democracy is in fact another word for Mob Rule… if 51 out
of a 100 of your neighbors want to eat you for breakfast, they can”. (1)
The city-state Washington, District of Columbia, is a
democracy, but it is not part of the confederation. It is a foreign entity, with
its own constitution and laws, like the City of London, or Vatican City. Its
original purpose was never to act as the determining body for what went on in
the States, but simply to be a hub of communication thru which the States could
function. Because of the stupendous fraud committed by a small group of very
powerful business people, we are totally confused about the details of this and
do not remember our natural place in the order. And as Thomas Paine said:
“A long habit of not thinking
a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right.”
For clarification of this scam and everything else in
American history go to: http://annavonreitz.com/
Many are clamoring for the return of the Republic. We cannot
have both a republic and a democracy. This is why the founders wanted the
various groups of inhabitants to (s)elect the wisest to represent them. The
wisest were to make decisions in the highest good of the people because the founders
understood that the people sometimes do not know what is good for themselves. (Not
knowing what’s good for us is more true now than then!) So, in effect, our
Republic is a “parent-ocracy”.
And what rule of law were those people disposed to use?
The original
guiding document for the States, which has never been repealed, came together
in 1781 and was called The Articles of
Confederation, “The Articles” for short. (The famous “Constitution”, around
which there is MUCH heated discussion, was not what the members of Congress had
gathered to create in 1789. Their specific intention was to comb out The
Articles, to fine tune and finish it. But this plan went awry. This is a
neglected fact in American history; the creation of the Constitution seems to
have been an event born of devious machinations. According to Nathan Griffith, an associate professor of political
science at Belmont University: “They
were supposed to meet to make amendments to the Articles of Confederation but
ended up with a whole new form of government. Not just a new constitution, but
a whole new form of government.“ (2)
For a detailed examination of this most important topic, see
the article by Alan J. Painter: http://www.taroscopes.com/miscellanous-pages/artconfed.pdf
).
The Articles was the pure vision for the governing of the
confederacy and outlined its premises. It is from that document that comes the
true law of the land: Common Law.
How We Lost It
Before 1938, when “color of law”, meaning the present,
fraudulent, statutory regulation, commercial law system was instituted, we still
used Common Law and were still
considered sovereigns. Without a large discourse on how we got lost from the
time of the so-called Civil War, for which I refer you again to Anna von Reitz,
suffice it to say that we progressively fell out of the use of Common Law, from
the time of Abe Lincoln (not what he appeared to be)(3) to 1938 and Franklin
Roosevelt (who bankrupted the country and stole all the gold in 1933, also not
what he appeared to be), when the Supreme Court said, in effect, through its
judgments: “Because there is no real money, there is no real law.” (4)
After ’38, Common Law was ignored in favor of statutory
regulations, and real people became corporate fictions, ghosts on paper, the
property of the state, the chattel of a commercial law -based court system which
found it inconvenient to remember what sovereignty is, and we had to start
buying “privileges” from a government corporation, instead of being respected
for having automatic, natural, unalienable rights. It was at this point that our society fully shifted from being
responsibility-oriented to being blame-oriented.
And that’s how, and why, we got to where we are now. It was
a psycho-spiritual shift in which we had progressively relinquished our free
will, with the help of a few psychopaths who wanted to take over the world. The
country was financially bankrupt because we were spiritually bankrupt. No
integrity = no self-worth = no value = no gold.
Common law, in
short, means this: If there is no harm, there is no crime.
Period.
That’s our real law because it emulates divine law.
We are free to do anything we want as long as what we are
doing is not actually, in reality, causing harm. Not made-up harm, not
potential harm. In fact harm. This is
organic, spiritual law, not open to interpretation. Not, “free to do what you
want, as long as you don’t upset me”. Not, “free to do what you want, as long
as you don’t, under certain circumstances I can’t even think of right now, harm
me”. It is unstipulated, uninfringed upon
freedom. If I take my shirt off in public and someone freaks out, I have not committed a
crime. If they force me to put my shirt back on because they don’t like the
feelings they are having, they have
committed a crime.
Today, we have almost totally conditioned out of ourselves the
understanding that we are free, by nature. We now have, as the rule, exactly
the opposite of what the founders of our confederation had in mind when they
created it. What we have is, in fact, exactly what The States was created to
prevent happening: a policed state, rule by force, oppression. We have “law
enforcement officers” to stop us from breaking laws designed almost exclusively
to preempt imagined harm, instead of peacekeepers whose job is to protect
sovereigns from infringement.
The difference in systems is that the first is the state of a
victim, based on paranoia, irresponsibility, and lack of trust in the divine
plan, and as such is actually a delusional state in which one imagines harm
that is not really happening. The second is the state of a creator, based on
confidence, self-responsibility and trust in the innate goodness of human
nature, which was the foundational thinking
of those who created The States. (It is interesting to note here that “the
U.S.A. inc.” has more laws than anyplace else on Earth, while simultaneously
having a larger percentage of its population in jail than anyplace else. Our
belief in crimeless, “victimless”, crimes has victimized our society.)
Here is the one, true, overarching, fundamental, guiding
principle, the spiritual law:
Thou shalt not infringe on the
free will of another.
“Don’t do to others what you don’t want them to do to you”
covers all possible, actual crimes.
Free will is total freedom as a spiritual truth, unalienable.
And it is an awareness of oneself in
relationship with other selves, and the Universe, and it supersedes any human
laws. If you are considering doing something and it violates the guiding
principle, then you are about to commit a transgression. We shouldn’t need a
government to make sure this is respected; it is our responsibility to be true
to our nature, and as long as we are willing to pay attention, everyone knows
the difference between right and wrong. It is for this reason that we must
ultimately conclude that, when in our
right minds, operating from our true nature, we need no government at all.
The guiding principle reflects the purpose the divine has
for us: a peaceful, healthy society with flexible guidelines, based on open
communication, which makes “good faith” agreements (not contracts which bind, and therefore are a form of slavery and
an expression, literally, of black magic). A healthy society is a culture that does
not have an artificial, coercive, “retributive justice” -based legal structure generated
from fear that tries to control behavior through the use of pre-emptive strikes.
Allowing each other complete freedom presents the greatest
challenge for the ego, because then we are forced to take responsibility for our
lives rather than blame others for what we are experiencing. If we really
intend to call ourselves sovereign beings creating our own reality, we will
have to let go entirely of scapegoating. This is the whole point of our new age:
we come back into unity and peace-full
coexistence by forsaking duality and separation in which we attack each other.
Peace outside comes from peace inside.
And this is why America has yet to escape the womb: the
colonists were not spiritually mature enough to match the visionary level of the
founders, so they couldn’t act as true sovereigns; sovereignty has to be maintained. From that time, self-rule,
and thus, Common Law, freedom, and with them the economy, had eroded to such a
point that by the early 1900s Americans were screaming to the government to be
saved. This is what caused the rapacious Federal Reserve Bank to come to power.
Americans actually called for it. (5)
How We Get It Back
So, for those who say they want to return to the Republic,
but want laws to stop others from smoking cannabis because they might drive
crazy and hit them, (or any other made-up, paranoid nonsense) I say: Do the inner work and get over it, because we have no right to control the
behavior of anyone but ourselves! Trying to control others’ behavior is cowardly,
war-like and irresponsible, and is not the behavior of a sovereign creator who
trusts them-self or their divine Source. It’s just plain not loving.
If we think there can be a lasting Global Currency Reset and
a return to the freedom of the original Republic without a spiritual awakening
that would return us to Common Law and the total respect (and enjoyment!) of everyone’s
sovereignty, we are deluding ourselves. It is impossible to have an external
reset without having an internal one first because it would have no foundation,
no root to secure its growth. And that takes the willingness to be completely
honest and responsible for one’s creations.
One final sacred cow to slaughter: The States of America are
not only not a country, they are not a Christian
country. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are a non-denominational, neutral
entity, meant to be a haven for the expression of free thought and the practice
of any religious or spiritual system. We used to be fond of saying that we have
a separation of church and state here, didn’t we?
Remember, those who started this place were not Christians.
In fact, some, like Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine, were quite outspoken
about how destructive Christian thinking can be. They were, in fact, mostly Freemasons.
So get over it. (6)
Paine summed up his excellent philosophy in one terse, beautiful,
loving statement:
“The world is my
country, and my religion is to do good.”
We were designed to
be, and are about to become, a free, humanitarian-based, Aquarian society, (7)
and we will be done with the strange, outrageous, disempowering situation of
some people having to get the approval and permission of other people before
they can do what they want to do.
When Donald Trump took office one of the first things he did
was to have the portrait of Andrew Jackson rehung there. Jackson, a Freemason
leader, disintegrated the criminal central bank of his time that was fleecing
the people, and he settled the national debt that had accrued from their
conniving.
Donald also hung gold curtains in the office in place of the
red ones. I think he is exchanging blood for value, and that he symbolizes us
making the choice to renew our spiritual sovereignty and to “gold-back”
ourselves.
How We Can Live It
Our purpose can be fulfilled only if we become willing to give
up fearing and trying to control each other and what will come next, unify, and take responsibility by
trusting the good in ourselves and the divine plan the founders believed in
when they affirmed that freedom was self-evident.
Can we imagine living where we feel safe knowing no
delusional person in a uniform with a hard-on for control is going to stop us in
the act of driving because we are going five miles an hour faster than they think
we should? Can we imagine feeling secure knowing that no misguided fellow human
somewhere is going to take our money from our bank account and give it to a
criminal organization, and then tell us that we are the criminals?
Can we suspend our normal thinking now to imagine what it
would feel like to be safe in this world?
Take a moment to imagine the peace that would give us. It is
peace that is the foundation of happiness, freedom, and prosperity.
We need to imagine that, for that is our purpose and destiny.
Are we up to it?
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
(1) Judge Anna von Reitz, http://annavonreitz.com/beingstupidpart20.pdf:
… generations of
Americans have been taught (wrongly) that they live in a "democracy"
and fed the impression that "democracy is good" and that we should be
committed to "spreading democracy" throughout the world. Democracy is
in fact another word for Mob Rule, which fundamentally disrespects the value of
individual lives and unalienable rights and the existence of private assets. It
is the antithesis of the republican government we are owed and equally the
enemy of any true monarchy. In a democracy, if 51 out of a 100 of your
neighbors want to eat you for breakfast, they can. It is, again, a nasty,
brutal, pagan, retrograde form of government that cannot be logically defended
in modern times and is in fact yet another excuse that the perpetrators offer
for their crimes----the false claim that we ever knowingly offered to live in a
"democracy" when we are owed a republican form of government.
(2)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-22/how-tennessee-could-be-about-start-constitutional-crisis
(3) Dr. Steve Pieczenik:
http://stevepieczenik.com/the-truth-about-the-civil-war/
(4) https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2014/08/24/everything-you-know-about-the-united-states-and-its-laws-is-wrong-the-united-states-is-not-the-united-states-of-america/
1938 – The U.S. Supreme
Court’s Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), decision made contracts the rule in the courts. This ruling voided the
long-standing . Swift v. Tyson, 16 Pet. 1, 41 U. S. 18 (1842) No other law or court
decisions prior to 1938 could be cited in future court cases. In effect, Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins made contracts [contract law
or UCC-Admiralty Law; NOT the Common Law and the Constitution] the rule in the
courts under the Commercial (Negotiable Instruments) Act. The Supreme
Court ruled that all federal cases will be judged under the Negotiable Instruments Law. There would be no more decisions based
on the Common Law at the federal level. Prior to 1938, the Supreme Court was
dealing with Public Law, that is, the Common Law codified as statutes. Since
1938, the Supreme Court has dealt with Public Policy, that is private
commercial law created through contracts.
(5) “The Panic of 1907” was a financial coup of huge
proportions orchestrated by the robber barons of the time, led by J.P. Morgan,
for the purpose of scaring Americans into allowing the creation of a central, privately-owned
bank, The Federal Reserve, to take control of the money. They promised they
would be able to keep the economy balanced, but their real plan was to do just
what has happened since: totally destroy the American economy and defeat the
people. Morgan’s primary bankroller was the Rothschild family in Europe.
(6) On The Origin of Freemasonry by Thomas Paine: https://archive.org/details/ThomasPaineOnTheOriginOfFreeMasonry
(7) It is important to understand that the term “new age”
has been skewed to mean an “ism”, a religion, or set of beliefs and practices.
This is misleading. The New Age is a time on Earth, an era or cycle. Therefore,
everyone alive right now is, technically, a “new-ager”, including all the
modern Christians.
The Purpose of the Union of the States by enerchi1111 on Scribd