Good website to research voting fraud
http://www.votescam.org
Voting Fraud Video Archive
http://www.votescam.org/election_fraud_video_archive
************************************************
Frequently Asked Questions on Voting Technology
Here are some simple answers to basic questions.
Q: Why are computers a problem for vote counting? Isn't technology the answer to absolutely everything?
A: In this case, no. Computers
are a problem because the votes are counted in secret -- inside the
computer's "black box" which is currently off-limits to everyone, even
elections supervisors. Only the voting machine manufacturer knows how
the computers are programmed. Right now, a very tiny handful of extremely shady people control the top voting machine companies that manufacture the machines, and most of them have ties to the extreme right-wing. (read Bob FItrakis on Diebold and the Vast Right-Wing Voting Conspiracy)
Secret ballot counting used to be illegal. It's no better than a bunch of thugs taking the paper ballots into a back room and locking the door.
Secret ballot counting used to be illegal. It's no better than a bunch of thugs taking the paper ballots into a back room and locking the door.
Q: Are Optical Scanners okay? They use paper ballots.
A: No, they are not okay. They scan paper ballots, but the scanners themselves are computers and have been proven easily hacked and manipulated.
Q: Isn’t an audit of the paper ballots enough?
A: No, it
isn’t. The only way to know that every vote was properly counted is to
count the ballots by hand in public. Audits alone allow the potential of
manipulation and fraud. They are time consuming, often prohibitively
expensive, and right now they require legal challenge to procure one in
many states. Additionally, once the ballots leave the precinct or are
stored overnight, the "chain of custody" is broken. Any audit that takes
place after that point may have experienced ballot tampering.
Q: Can’t you rig a paper ballot election?
A: With a process that includes stringent oversight,
it’s very difficult to do so. See-though plastic boxes can prevent
ballot box stuffing. Counting the ballots in public on election day
stops the back-room fraud prevalent in the past. Additionally -- and
most importantly -- paper fraud is detectable, whereas computerized
fraud is not.
What we need is a vigilant public aware of the threats that face our ballots on election day. We haven't had that! We've been asleep at the wheel, assuming our votes are protected, when in fact, the CROOK ARE IN CONTROL.
What we need is a vigilant public aware of the threats that face our ballots on election day. We haven't had that! We've been asleep at the wheel, assuming our votes are protected, when in fact, the CROOK ARE IN CONTROL.
Q: Aren’t computers more accurate?
A: No. Studies show that,
of every voting system in use, paper ballots counts are the most
accurate, and when done properly the results are produced quickly. In
first world countries across the globe, from Swizterland to Canada to
Israel, paper ballots are counted by hand quickly and efficiently.
Q: Don’t we need computers for disabled people to vote privately?
A: The
disabled community was cynically used by proponents of ballotless
touchscreen voting machines -- much to their horror, once they
understood the fraud associated with those machines. While computers
cannot be allowed for use by the general public, the exception is that
one electronic voting machine can be allowed in each precinct, e.g. an
Automark, for people with disabilities to use. Under no circumstances
whatsoever can any other voters be allowed to use this especially
designated machine.
Q: Are early voting and mail-in ballots a good thing?
A: No! They are not! They do not allow for proper oversight and chain of custody of our ballots.
They are, in fact, absolutely INSANE practices if we take even a moment
to consider it. We have no idea where our ballot goes after we cast it.
See also: The NO VOTE BY MAIL PROJECT and their 89 ARTICLES ON WHY VOTE BY MAIL IS A VERY BAD IDEA
Only
paper ballots, counted in the precinct on election day, are an
acceptable method of voting and vote counting at this point in time,
when all other technology requires faith and trust in those who control
the machines.
Q: Aren't you just a crazy whacked-out conspiracy theorist with a tinfoil hat who hangs out with Mel Gibson?
A: Wish it were true! I'd
rather be crazy than watch my country and planet be destroyed from
within by corporate gangsters, vicious banksters, and delusional
religious extremists. But if you don't believe me, check out THE
EVIDENCE: