911blogger.com
November 20, 2012
Ferdinando Imposimato Points to AE911truth Evidence
[Editor’s Note: The following is an excerpt of a letter written by
Italian Supreme Court President Ferdinando Imposimato for the Journal of
9/11 Studies. While AE911Truth does not speculate on who was involved
in the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers, we applaud Imposimato for
speaking out on this important issue, calling attention to the explosive
9/11 evidence, and, most importantly, pursuing justice.]
Ferdinando Imposimato is the Honorary President of the Supreme Court
of Italy and a former Senator who served on the Anti-Mafia Commission in
three administrations. He is the author or co-author of seven books on
international terrorism, state corruption, and related matters, and a
Grand Officer of the Order of Merit of the Republic of Italy.
The reports of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST), November 20, 2005, set forth the following conclusions: The
airplanes that struck each of the Twin Towers caused a breach as well as
an explosion evidenced by a giant fireball. The remaining jet fuel
flowed onto the lower floors, sustaining the fires. The heat from the
fires deformed the building structures and both towers collapsed
completely from top to bottom. Very little that was of any size remained
after these events except steel as well as aluminum fragments and the
pulverized dust from the concrete floors.
World Trade Center 7 also collapsed–in a way that was inconsistent
with the common experience of engineers. All three buildings collapsed
completely, but Building 7 was not hit by a plane. WTC7’s collapse
violated common experience and was unprecedented.
The NIST report does not analyze the actual nature of the collapses.
According to experts at the Toronto Hearings (Sept. 8-11, 2011), the
collapses had features that indicate controlled explosions. I agree with
architect Richard Gage and engineer Jon Cole, both highly experienced
professionals [from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth – now
numbering 1,700 strong], who have arrived at their conclusions through
reliable tests, scientific proof, and the visual testimony of people
above suspicion, including firefighters and victims. The authoritative
theologian David Ray Griffin has described very precisely why the
hypothesis of controlled demolition should be taken into consideration.
Various witnesses heard bursts of explosions.
According to NIST the collapse of Building 7 was due to fires
provoked by the collapse of the twin towers. Chemist and independent
researcher Kevin Ryan, however, has demonstrated that NIST gave
contradictory versions of the collapse of Building 7. In a preliminary
report NIST declared that WTC7 was destroyed because of fires provoked
by diesel fuel stored in the building, while in a second report this
fuel was no longer considered the cause of the building’s collapse.
Additional comments on the NIST version of events have been made by
David Chandler, another expert witness at the Journal of 9/11 Studies
Letters, September 2012 Toronto Hearings. Despite NIST’s claim of three
distinct phases of collapse, Chandler pointed out that many available
videos show that for about two and a half seconds the acceleration of
the building cannot be distinguished from freefall. NIST has been
obliged to agree with this empirical fact as pointed out by Chandler,
and now understandable by everyone.
The only possibility for achieving justice is to submit the best
evidence concerning the involvement of specific individuals in 9/11 to
the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and ask him to
investigate according to the articles 12, 13, 15 and 17, letters a and
b, of the Statute of the ICC, recalling also the preamble of the
Statute:
“Recognizing that such grave crimes threaten the peace, security and the well being of the world,”
“Affirming that the most serious crimes of concern to the
international community as a whole must not go unpunished and that their
effective prosecution must be ensured by taking measures at the
national level and by enhancing international cooperation, ”
“Determined to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these
crimes and thus to contribute to the prosecution of such crimes,
Recalling that the duty of every state to exercise its jurisdiction over
those responsible for international crimes, … “
http://www.infowars.com/italian-supreme-court-president-calls-for-new-911-investigation-at-icc/