Newly released court documents in
the Aurora, CO theater “Batman massacre” case reveals startling inside
accusations about who may actually be behind the shootings that left at
least 70 people either dead or injured in the early morning hours of
July 20th.
Friday's report by
the online version of Denver's Westword Magazine details shocking
claims made by, what appears to be, a new victim in a case that has
throttled a community still in mourning over the tragic events.
According to the court documents an individual, whose name has been
officially redacted from the documents, came forward to file a “Motion
to Intervene” for the right to be reasonably heard under the Crime
Victims' Rights Act (a)(4), for the purposes of presenting newly discovered evidence to the court.
Corroborating much of a recent Conspiracy Examiner story maintaining the situation as potentially being another horrific (rogue government faction) conspiracy and
possible false-flag event, the newly discovered evidence, thrown out of
court by Judge William Sylvester days later, details stunning
accusations against billionaire Philip Anschutz,
Police Chief Dan Oates, Arapaho County Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers and,
according to the alleged victim, the Illuminati as being potential
co-conspirators in the crime.
The
stunning accusations, dated August 27, reveal a startling story by the
claimant as having been visited at home by police chief Dan Oates and
Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers where they forced the unnamed individual to
testify as a fake victim of the shootings, under the threat of being
arrested for prostitution and escort services and charity fraud, for the
purposes of garnering an easy conviction against alleged shooter James Holmes.
But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening
areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been
shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely
some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on
behalf of the conspirators and wants multiple individuals involved in
the situation to take polygraph tests to prove their innocence.
Claiming
that their conscience will not let fraudulent testimony contribute to an
improper conviction of James Holmes, the new mystery victim asked that
the judge submit the case to the FBI and the US Congress for further
investigation into the alleged conspiracy. The judge, however, instead
of taking a closer look, decided to strike down the motion as
fraudulent, claiming the motion as likely forged by an individual or
individuals unassociated with the events. The judge also suggested the
situation be investigated by the Arapahoe County Sheriff's office and
those responsible for the motion be taken into custody by the Arapahoe
County Department of Human Services and “referred to the appropriate
mental health agency.”
But it may
in fact be the judge that needs the mental attention as all the
evidence collected in the case thus far seems to point toward mostly
agreeing with the individual who filed the claim, despite the media and
the court's attempts to suppress any evidence that doesn't support the
official story. Multiple and corroborating eyewitness testimony stated
what appeared to bemultiple individuals involved in the shooting,
including supporting official dispatch audio. Individuals interviewed
by local media immediately after the event also claimed to have seen
teargas canisters being deployed in the theater simultaneously from two
different directions, in addition to side-by-side images of James Holmes
prior to the shootings and the orange haired individual taken into
custody as the alleged lone gunmen after the event looks startlingly like two different individuals. There also seems to have been two different gas masks found at the scene, in addition to other damning evidence that doesn't jive with the official version of the events.
The
individual who filed the motion also added that they wanted their
portion of the charity to be donated to James Holmes' prison commissary,
after using the money to find Mr. Holmes “real” attorneys who are
actually willing to act in the honest defense of James Holmes, or the
individual in custody for the crime.
The
motion, as certified by the Arapahoe County Dist. Atty. and public
defenders offices, was sent via the United States Postal Service, then
was quickly denied and subsequently released days ago to the public for
reasons yet to be determined.
Perhaps
one of the most telling aspects of the circumstances, however, happens
to be the creepy dead silence about the motion by the media, especially
considering every little detail about a situation like this is normally
scrutinized at every angle after being groomed with a fine tooth comb
and examined under a microscope.
It was just weeks ago that certain local media outlets were considering suing for access to court records because,
according to those outlets, the community had a right to know so the
victims and the community could more easily begin the healing process
and find some semblance of closure. Perhaps information that may open
new wounds, however, regardless of how accurate or important that
information may be, may not be the kind of information they were looking
for.
