The White House has finally responded to criticism over US
President Barack Obama’s hushed signing last week of an Executive Order
that allows the government to command privately-owned communication
systems and acknowledges its implications.
When President Obama inked his name to the Assignment of National
Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions Executive
Order on July 6, he authorized the US Department of Homeland Security to
take control of the country’s wired and wireless communications —
including the Internet — in instances of emergency. The signing was
accompanied with little to no acknowledgment outside of the White House,
but initial reports on the order quickly caused the public to speak out
over what some equated to creating an Oval Office kill switch for the
Web. Now the Obama administration is addressing those complaints by
calling the Executive Order a necessary implement for America’s national
security.
“The [order] recognizes the creation of DHS and
provides the Secretary the flexibility to organize the communications
systems and functions that reside within the department as [Homeland
Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano] believes will be most
effective,” White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden tells the Washington Post.
Hayden insists that “The [order] does not transfer authorities between or among departments,” but
the order does indeed allow the DHS to establish and implement control
over even the privately owned communication systems in the country,
including Internet Service Providers such as Time Warner, Verizon and
Comcast, if the administration agrees that it is warranted for
security’s sake.
Immediately after last week’s signing, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said the order allowed the DHS "the authority to seize private facilities when necessary, effectively shutting down or limiting civilian communications."
Following
up with the Post this week, EPIC attorney Amie Stephanovich stands by
that initial explanation, agreeing that the DHS can now “seize
control of telecommunications facilities, including telephone, cellular
and wireless networks, in order to prioritize government communications
over private ones in an emergency.”
“The previous orders did not give DHS those authorities over private and commercial networks,” adds. Stepanovich. “That’s a new authority.”
According to the order, the DHS can take charge of “commercial, government, and privately owned communications resources” to satisfy what is described as “priority communication requirements.”
With little insight from outside the White House, though, what
constitutes such an emergency may very well be decided on by Washington,
where the country’s elected leaders are still split on all things
involving the Internet.
Even still, Stepanovich says that
approaching Capitol Hill for comment before rushing through an Executive
Order could have caused things to come out differently, but would have
also arguably brought forth a firestorm such as the one that accompanied
an attempt to pass the Stop Online Piracy Act. When Congress tried to
pass SOPA this year — which included provisions that were argued to
grossly regulate the Internet — protests nationwide played a massive
part in killing the legislation.
“This should have been done by Congress, so there could have been proper debate about it,” Stepanovich tells the Post of last week’s signing. “This is not authority that should be granted by executive order.”
White House spokesperson Hayden adds to the Post, “Mobile phones, the Internet, and social media are all now integral to the communications landscape,”
concreting still the allegations that this order could be used as a
kill switch to any of the millions upon millions of handheld and desktop
devices across the country.
http://rt.com/usa/news/white-house-systems-order-142/